Close Minded Podcast
Close Minded Podcast
Carrie Severino on the Kavanaugh Confirmation One Year Later
0:00
-45:48

Carrie Severino on the Kavanaugh Confirmation One Year Later

In the summer of 2018, Justice Anthony Kennedy retired from the Supreme Court and President Trump nominated Brett Kavanaugh to fill the open position. The uproar that followed, and the outrageous smear campaign that the Democrats and the corporate press waged against Kavanaugh, were beyond almost anything I've ever seen in politics. I followed the nomination, Senate hearings, and final confirmation of Kavanaugh very closely, and I expected them to be contentious and that the opposition would put up a fight. I'm pretty cynical about the corporate press, yet I was still shocked to see the utter depravity of their attempts to destroy a man who ended up being fully vindicated--and fortunately, confirmed to the Court in October 2018.

But the battle over Kavanaugh was much broader than an isolated accusation of sexual assault. My guest today is Carrie Severino, coauthor of "Justice On Trial," a bestselling new book--this despite a total media blackout--that provides a comprehensive account of the Kavanaugh nomination from beginning to end. Carrie and her co-author, Mollie Hemingway, interviewed over 100 people, including members of the Court and of Congress, and even broke some new reporting as part of the book. She is the leader and public face of the Judicial Crisis Network, a legal advocacy group that seeks to nominate judges who hold to an originalist view of the Constitution.

Get Justice On Trial on Amazon.

Follow Carrie Severino on the web:

https://judicialnetwork.com

Follow Mollie Hemingway on the web:

Discussion about this podcast

Close Minded Podcast
Close Minded Podcast
“Close Minded? Isn't that sort of narrow and negative?”<br />
<br />
At first glance, that's certainly a reasonable reaction. (But it got your attention, didn't it?) However, the name of the show is not just a marketing tactic, but rooted in a deep truth.<br />
<br />
G.K. Chesterton once wrote the following:<br />
<br />
“Merely having an open mind is nothing. The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.”<br />
<br />
A hallmark of maturity is the ability to hold up an idea you don't necessarily agree with and scrutinize it, to evaluate it dispassionately without having to own it for yourself.<br />
<br />
Another sign of maturity is one's willingness to engage a wide variety of ideas and topics without being frightened away just because someone shouts “problematic!”–whether it be a Twitter mob, a self-hating Social Justice Warrior on Facebook, or even your own tribe.<br />
<br />
So around here we aren't afraid to discuss lots of ideas, regardless of our actual positions:<br />
<br />
Political anarchism? Check.<br />
Human sexuality? Check.<br />
Trump as an existential dictatorial threat to Western Civilization? Check.<br />
Darwinism and Intelligent Design? Check.<br />
The intersection of technology and philosophy? Check.<br />
<br />
But there's more! We also aren't interested in claims that certain genres of literature are “uncool.” Who cares?<br />
<br />
We are readers. Avid readers of wide-ranging works. Readers who cultivate what Tolkien called “the leaf mold” of the mind, the topsoil of our moral imagination and creativity.<br />
<br />
We aren't embarrassed to enjoy “kid lit” and YA fiction, or afraid to read sociological & political works that challenge our assumptions. We enjoy classic novels, hard-boiled crime thrillers, controversial works of theology & culture, economics, productivity & personal development. We are not bound by social or political convention.<br />
<br />
We “read for pleasure in an age of distraction” (Alan Jacobs). We consume and engage books for stimulation, conviction & enrichment. We want to stretch our minds, grow in empathy, & experience the joys & challenges of reading good books.<br />
<br />
We read with an open mind in order to close it on something.<br />
<br />
--------------------------------<br />
<br />
“But wait! Shouldn't it be CloseD Minded (with a d)?”<br />
<br />
Welcome, fellow grammar nerd, to my tortured existence. I do happen to believe that “Closed Minded” is preferable to “Close Minded”–and thus, I die a little bit inside each time I say or write it. HOWEVER, I went with “Close Minded” for two reasons. First, technically both are considered acceptable–see here and here. Second, when I compared the Google search results for both spellings, “Close” had exponentially more hits, so I followed the basic rules of internet marketing and went with what people are actually searching for.<br />
<br />
Case close, er, closed.<br />
<br />
Subscribe here: www.closemindedpodcast.com/subscribe